Examiner Tuan A Pham has allowed 696 of 814 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Tuan A Pham maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 852 total applications, 814 have been disposed (decided). Of those 814 decided applications, 696 were allowed and 118 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 86%. This pooled record spans a single art unit. The figures represent historical dispositions and do not constitute a prediction of the outcome in any specific application.
This record aggregates dispositions across all of the examiner's art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate reflects the share of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) that were allowed, calculated over the 814 disposed cases. Pooled figures describe the examiner's past record in aggregate and are not predictions for any individual filing. To understand performance within a specific art unit, consult the per-unit detail section.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 526 decided applications with an interview and 288 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tuan A Pham has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 852 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP