Examiner Tuan A Vu has allowed 932 of 1,266 decided applications (74%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Tuan A Vu maintains a public record spanning two art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 1,266 disposed applications, the examiner has allowed 932 and abandoned 334, yielding an allowance rate of 74%. This rate reflects the proportion of applications decided (allowed or abandoned) and does not represent a share of all filings received. The pooled record aggregates outcomes from both art units under the examiner's jurisdiction.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units and reflects historical outcomes. Allowance rates describe past decisions on applications already disposed and are not predictions of outcomes for any specific pending application. Pooled figures mask variation between individual art units; detailed breakdowns by unit appear in separate reporting. Aggregate statistics provide context for the examiner's overall record but do not forecast results in individual cases.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 560 decided applications with an interview and 698 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tuan A Vu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,310 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP