Examiner Tuan Minh Nguyen has allowed 14 of 21 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Tuan Minh Nguyen maintains a public record across two art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 44 total applications, 21 have been disposed (decided). Of those 21 decided applications, 14 were allowed and 7 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 67% across the disposed applications. This rate reflects the examiner's pooled record and is computed only from applications that have reached a final decision, excluding pending matters.
This record aggregates the examiner's activity across multiple art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 67% describes the historical share of decided applications that resulted in allowance. Such pooled figures reflect past outcomes across different subject areas and art units and are not predictive of any single application's prosecution path. Individual art-unit records, where available, may show different rates.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Based on 41 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Based on 3 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tuan Minh Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 44 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP