Examiner Tuan S Nguyen has allowed 393 of 513 decided applications (77%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Tuan S Nguyen has a public record spanning 4 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 513 decided applications, the examiner issued allowances in 393 cases, yielding an overall allowance rate of 77%. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 56% to 93%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art-unit assignments and reflects the proportion of decided applications that received allowances over the period covered by the public record.
A pooled, cross-art-unit record aggregates an examiner's decisions across multiple art units. The overall allowance rate (77%) describes the past record and is not a prediction of the outcome in any specific application. The range (56% to 93%) reflects variation among the examiner's individual art units but does not identify which rate applies to any particular art unit or technology area. Detailed per-art-unit records appear in a separate section of this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 209 decided applications with an interview and 68 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 64 decided applications with an interview and 62 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 59 decided applications with an interview and 28 without.
Based on 23 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tuan S Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 539 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP