Examiner Tuan V Thai has allowed 1,095 of 1,178 decided applications (93%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Tuan V Thai maintains a public record across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 1,178 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 1,095 and abandoned 83, yielding an allowance rate of 93%. The allowance rate ranges from 90% to 95% across these art units. This pooled figure represents the examiner's historical disposition of decided cases and does not forecast any individual application's outcome.
This record aggregates the examiner's activity across multiple art units in TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate of 93% describes the historical proportion of decided applications that were allowed, calculated from the total disposed count. Pooled figures mask variation among individual art units; the range of 90% to 95% shows that allowance rates differ by art unit. Historical rates do not predict future outcomes on any specific application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 213 decided applications with an interview and 310 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 77 decided applications with an interview and 255 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 71 decided applications with an interview and 252 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tuan V Thai has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,178 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP