Examiner Urmana Fairooz Islam

What the data says.

Urmana Fairooz Islam maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 38 disposed applications, the examiner issued 26 allowances and 12 abandonments, yielding an allowance rate of 68%. The examiner's practice spans a single art unit (2125). This pooled figure reflects historical outcomes on decided applications and does not constitute a prediction for any specific pending or future case.

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units in TC 2100 into one set of statistics. The allowance rate of 68% describes the proportion of decided applications (allowed or abandoned) and is a historical summary, not a forecast. Aggregate figures mask variation across individual art units and application types. A complete view requires review of art-unit-specific data and individual application histories.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Urmana Fairooz Islam

• 01What is Urmana Fairooz Islam's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 68%, based on 26 allowed and 12 abandoned applications out of 38 total disposed applications in TC 2100.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The examiner's public record spans 1 art unit (2125) within TC 2100.
• 03What does the 68% allowance rate mean for my application?

  The 68% figure is a historical average of past outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application. Individual results depend on claim scope, prior art, examiner position, and prosecution history.
• 04How many applications has this examiner decided?

  The examiner has disposed of 38 applications: 26 allowed and 12 abandoned.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.