Examiner Uyen T Le has allowed 915 of 1,086 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Uyen T Le has a public record spanning five art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 1,086 decided applications, 915 were allowed, yielding an 84% allowance rate. The examiner's work spans art units 2156, 2157, 2162, 2163, and 2171. Allowance rates across these art units range from 80% to 93%, reflecting variation in the examiner's record by individual art unit. This pooled figure aggregates all decided cases and does not predict the outcome of any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's performance across five separate art units in TC 2100. The 84% allowance rate reflects historical outcomes on 1,086 decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending cases. A pooled figure describes the past record only and is not a prediction about any individual application or art unit. Individual art-unit records are available separately and may differ materially from the aggregate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 120 decided applications with an interview and 327 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 75 decided applications with an interview and 209 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 106 decided applications with an interview and 127 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 21 decided applications with an interview and 63 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Uyen T Le has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,120 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP