LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/VAISHALI SHAH
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Vaishali Shah

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 231 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Vaishali Shah has allowed 134 of 231 decided applications (58%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

58% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2156 · 70%AU 2158 · 35%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Vaishali Shah maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 231 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 58%. This rate reflects 134 allowed applications and 97 abandoned applications. The allowance rate ranges from 35% to 70% across the examiner's art units with substantial records. The overall pooled figure aggregates outcomes across these units and describes the examiner's historical record; it is not a prediction for any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record combines outcomes from multiple art units into a single aggregate allowance rate. This figure describes past decisions across different subject areas and does not reflect performance in any single art unit or predict outcomes on individual applications. The range shows variation among the units contributing to the pool. Aggregate statistics characterize historical performance only and are not forecasts.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2156
185 APPS · 70% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

70% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 69%
DISPOSITION106 / 46 / 33allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION18.8 moart unit avg 20.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY41.5 moart unit avg 40.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility56% · art unit 56%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)50%
§103 — Obviousness99% · art unit 84%
§112 — Written description & definiteness65%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW78%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW15%+63 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 132 decided applications with an interview and 20 without.

ART UNIT 2158
79 APPS · 35% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

35% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 48%
DISPOSITION28 / 51 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION26.5 moart unit avg 23.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY47.6 moart unit avg 49.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility80% · art unit 52%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)43%
§103 — Obviousness99% · art unit 87%
§112 — Written description & definiteness82%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW56%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW9%+47 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 45 decided applications with an interview and 34 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Vaishali Shah

  • What is Examiner Shah's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 58% over 231 decided applications, comprising 134 allowed and 97 abandoned applications.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    The record spans 2 art units (2156 and 2158) within TC 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary by art unit?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 35% to 70% across the examiner's art units with substantial records. The overall 58% is a pooled aggregate and does not reflect any single unit.
  • What does this record predict about my application?
    Historical allowance rates describe past outcomes and are not predictions of any specific application. Outcome depends on the application's claims, prior art, and prosecution history.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Vaishali Shah has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 264 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP