Examiner Van Kim T Nguyen has allowed 71 of 100 decided applications (71%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Van Kim T Nguyen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across 2 art units. Over 100 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 71, yielding a 71% allowance rate. The allowance rate varies across the art units, ranging from 52% to 81%. This pooled figure reflects the examiner's combined record and does not isolate performance within any single art unit.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, producing a single overall allowance rate. This aggregate describes historical outcomes across decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's fate. Individual art units may show different rates; the range (52% to 81%) reflects that variation. These figures are correlational summaries of past dispositions, not causal indicators of future results.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Van Kim T Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 100 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP