Examiner Vasyl Dykyy has allowed 14 of 24 decided applications (58%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Vasyl Dykyy maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 24 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 14 and abandoned 10, yielding an allowance rate of 58% over the decided count. The examiner's practice spans one art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; it does not include pending applications and does not predict outcomes on any specific filing.
A pooled examiner record aggregates results across all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate and disposal counts describe what has occurred historically and reflect past outcomes only. Aggregate figures do not characterize individual applications or foretell specific dispositions. Reviewing an examiner's overall profile provides context on historical patterns but is not predictive of any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 24 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Vasyl Dykyy has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 24 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP