LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/VENKATANARAY PERUNGAVOOR
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Venkatanaray Perungavoor

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 130 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Venkatanaray Perungavoor has allowed 83 of 130 decided applications (64%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

64% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Venkatanaray Perungavoor maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a single art unit, the examiner has disposed of 130 applications. Of those 130 decided applications, 83 were allowed and 47 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 64%. This rate represents the proportion of applications granted or abandoned in the examiner's record; it describes past dispositions and is not predictive of any specific application's outcome.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate and application counts reflect historical disposition data only. Aggregate figures describe what has occurred in the examiner's caseload and do not forecast the resolution of any individual application. Per-art-unit detail, if available separately, may offer additional context.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2132
130 APPS · 64% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

64% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION83 / 47 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION40.2 moart unit avg 27.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY53.6 moart unit avg 41 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Venkatanaray Perungavoor

  • What is Venkatanaray Perungavoor's allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 64%, calculated from 83 allowed applications out of 130 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    The examiner's record spans 1 art unit within TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate tell me about my application?
    The allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. It describes past dispositions in the examiner's caseload.
  • What technology areas does this examiner cover?
    The examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Venkatanaray Perungavoor has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 130 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP