Examiner Victor Adelard Nault has allowed 8 of 14 decided applications (57%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Victor Adelard Nault's public record spans 1 art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 49 total applications, 14 have been disposed (decided), comprising 8 allowed and 6 abandoned applications. The allowance rate over these 14 decided applications is 57%. This pooled record reflects outcomes in the specified technology center over the examiner's tenure in that art unit.
This pooled record aggregates all applications decided across the examiner's art unit(s). The allowance rate of 57% describes past outcomes on 14 decided applications and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Pooled figures represent a historical summary; individual applications vary in complexity, claim scope, and examiner considerations that cannot be inferred from aggregate statistics alone.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 49 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Victor Adelard Nault has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 49 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP