LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/VICTOR D LESNIEWSKI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Victor D Lesniewski

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 58 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2007
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Victor D Lesniewski has allowed 20 of 58 decided applications (34%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

34% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2152 · 35%AU 2155 · 29%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Victor D Lesniewski maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 58 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 34%. This figure represents 20 allowed applications and 38 abandoned applications. The pooled rate reflects the examiner's record aggregated across both art units. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not include any pending matters. This public record is a summary of past dispositions and is not a prediction for any future application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units within a technology center. The figures presented describe historical dispositions and the overall allowance rate as a percentage of decided applications across all units combined. Because different art units handle distinct subject matter and may exhibit different patterns, a pooled rate is a general measure of the examiner's record and is not a prediction of the outcome in any specific application or art unit.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2152
51 APPS · 35% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

35% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 49%
DISPOSITION18 / 33 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION37.9 moart unit avg 28.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY56.4 moart unit avg 42.9 mo
ART UNIT 2155
7 APPS · 29% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

29% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION2 / 5 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION40.6 moart unit avg 27.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY49.8 moart unit avg 42.2 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Victor D Lesniewski

  • What is Victor D Lesniewski's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 34% over 58 disposed applications, comprising 20 allowed and 38 abandoned applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner maintains a public record across 2 art units (2152 and 2155) in TC 2100.
  • Is the pooled allowance rate a prediction for my application?
    No. The pooled rate describes past dispositions aggregated across art units and is not a prediction of outcome in any specific application.
  • What technology does this examiner handle?
    The examiner reviews applications in TC 2100, which covers Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Victor D Lesniewski has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 58 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP