Examiner Victor Nicholas Perry has allowed 10 of 10 decided applications (100%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Victor Nicholas Perry maintains a public record across one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 10 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 100%. Of 45 total applications in the record, 10 were allowed, 0 were abandoned, and 10 were disposed. This pooled figure reflects decided cases only and does not characterize pending applications. The record spans a single art unit, limiting aggregation effects.
This pooled record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art units. The 100% allowance rate describes 10 decided applications and reflects past outcomes only—it is not a prediction of any specific pending application. Pooled figures smooth variations across different art units and technology areas. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show different rates. Aggregate statistics describe historical disposition, not prospective case assessment.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Based on 45 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Victor Nicholas Perry has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 45 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP