Examiner Victor W Wang has allowed 40 of 95 decided applications (42%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Victor W Wang maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 95 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 40 and saw 55 abandoned, for an allowance rate of 42% over the decided pool. The record spans a single art unit. This allowance rate reflects outcomes on applications that reached final disposition—pending cases are excluded from the calculation. The figures present a historical summary of decided cases and do not indicate what will occur in any future application.
This pooled record aggregates all dispositions across one art unit in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 42% describes the share of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) that received allowance; it is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation within art units and do not forecast prosecution results. They serve as a reference point for understanding the examiner's past-case distribution only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 20 decided applications with an interview and 75 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Victor W Wang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 95 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP