Examiner Viet D Vu has allowed 255 of 321 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Viet D Vu maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 321 disposed applications, 255 were allowed and 66 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 79%. This rate is computed from decided applications only and does not include pending filings. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, pooled into one aggregate profile. These figures describe the historical record of applications decided to date and are not predictions about any specific pending application.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all assigned art units into pooled statistics. The allowance rate reflects the share of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) over a defined historical period. Aggregate figures characterize past disposition patterns and do not forecast the outcome of any individual application. Applications vary in scope, claim construction, and prior art, and individual results may differ from the pooled average.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 55 decided applications with an interview and 266 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Viet D Vu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 321 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP