Examiner Vijay Murali Balakrishnan has allowed 8 of 19 decided applications (42%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Vijay Murali Balakrishnan maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 46 total applications, 19 have been disposed of (decided). Of those 19 decided applications, 8 were allowed and 11 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 42% over the disposed count. The examiner works within a single art unit. This record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition and does not include pending cases.
This pooled record aggregates all decided applications across the examiner's art unit(s) in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 42% describes past outcomes on closed cases and is a historical aggregate, not a prediction of any specific application's fate. Pooled data masks variation within individual art units; a separate section of this profile may provide per-art-unit detail. Use aggregate figures to understand the examiner's overall pattern, not to forecast particular prosecution outcomes.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Based on 46 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Vijay Murali Balakrishnan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 46 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP