LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/VIJAY MURALI BALAKRISHNAN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Vijay Murali Balakrishnan

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 19 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Vijay Murali Balakrishnan has allowed 8 of 19 decided applications (42%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

42% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Vijay Murali Balakrishnan maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 46 total applications, 19 have been disposed of (decided). Of those 19 decided applications, 8 were allowed and 11 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 42% over the disposed count. The examiner works within a single art unit. This record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition and does not include pending cases.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all decided applications across the examiner's art unit(s) in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 42% describes past outcomes on closed cases and is a historical aggregate, not a prediction of any specific application's fate. Pooled data masks variation within individual art units; a separate section of this profile may provide per-art-unit detail. Use aggregate figures to understand the examiner's overall pattern, not to forecast particular prosecution outcomes.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2143
46 APPS · 42% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA
42% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 52%
DISPOSITION8 / 11 / 27allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION37.3 moart unit avg 29.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY47.3 moart unit avg 45.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility88% · art unit 53%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%
§103 — Obviousness91% · art unit 94%
§112 — Written description & definiteness86%

Based on 46 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Vijay Murali Balakrishnan

  • What is the overall allowance rate for this examiner?
    The allowance rate is 42%, calculated over 19 disposed applications (8 allowed, 11 abandoned). This is a historical aggregate and not a forecast of any individual application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's public record spans 1 art unit in TC 2100.
  • What is the difference between total applications and disposed applications?
    Total applications (46) includes all filings. Disposed applications (19) are those that have reached final decision—either allowed or abandoned. Pending cases are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
  • What does the allowance rate include?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of allowed applications among all decided cases. It includes allowed and abandoned applications only; pending applications are not part of the calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Vijay Murali Balakrishnan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 46 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP