LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/VINCENT LAI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Vincent Lai

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 41 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUL 2007
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Vincent Lai has allowed 32 of 41 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

78% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Vincent Lai's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. Over 41 disposed applications, Lai allowed 32 and abandoned 9, yielding an allowance rate of 78%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided cases (allowed plus abandoned) in the examiner's pooled record. The 78% figure is derived from applications that reached final disposition; pending applications are excluded from this calculation.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to the examiner. The allowance rate and application counts describe the examiner's past record and do not constitute a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Aggregate figures mask variation within individual art units and across time. This data is historical, not predictive.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2181
41 APPS · 78% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units, and program control and execution.

78% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 74%
DISPOSITION32 / 9 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION27.8 moart unit avg 18.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY40.4 moart unit avg 33.3 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Vincent Lai

  • What is Vincent Lai's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 78%, calculated from 41 disposed applications (32 allowed, 9 abandoned). This reflects the proportion of decided cases and is not a prediction for any specific application.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    One art unit (2181) within TC 2100. This pooled profile aggregates all data from that unit and represents the examiner's overall record.
  • What does the allowance rate include and exclude?
    The 78% rate includes allowed and abandoned applications only. Pending applications are excluded. The rate describes historical decisions, not outcomes of applications not yet decided.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Vincent Lai has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 41 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP