Examiner Vincent Lai has allowed 32 of 41 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Vincent Lai's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. Over 41 disposed applications, Lai allowed 32 and abandoned 9, yielding an allowance rate of 78%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided cases (allowed plus abandoned) in the examiner's pooled record. The 78% figure is derived from applications that reached final disposition; pending applications are excluded from this calculation.
This pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to the examiner. The allowance rate and application counts describe the examiner's past record and do not constitute a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Aggregate figures mask variation within individual art units and across time. This data is historical, not predictive.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Vincent Lai has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 41 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP