LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/VINCENT WEN-LIANG CHANG
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Vincent Wen-Liang Chang

TECH CENTER 2100 · 4 ART UNITS · 469 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 4 ART UNITS

Examiner Vincent Wen-Liang Chang has allowed 356 of 469 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

76% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2119 · 83%AU 2116 · 60%AU 2127 · 77%AU 2115 · 76%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Vincent Wen-Liang Chang maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning four art units: 2115, 2116, 2119, and 2127. Across 469 decided applications, his allowance rate is 76%, reflecting 356 allowed applications and 113 abandoned applications. His pooled allowance rate ranges from 60% to 83% across these art units, indicating variation in allowance rates depending on the specific art unit and record composition.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across four art units within TC 2100. The overall 76% allowance rate describes past outcomes on decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Variation across individual art units (60% to 83%) reflects differences in examination patterns or case composition by art unit. Pooled figures are descriptive of historical record only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2119
312 APPS · 83% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines electric power networks, supply, and distribution.

83% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 83%
DISPOSITION233 / 48 / 31allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION21.4 moart unit avg 21.6 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY33.3 moart unit avg 31.5 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility26% · art unit 33%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)95%
§103 — Obviousness94% · art unit 74%
§112 — Written description & definiteness56%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW90%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW75%+15 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 147 decided applications with an interview and 134 without.

ART UNIT 2116
128 APPS · 60% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines control or regulating systems.

60% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 78%
DISPOSITION77 / 51 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.8 moart unit avg 24.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY37 moart unit avg 37.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility25% · art unit 32%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)56%
§103 — Obviousness94% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness29%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW78%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW55%+23 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 27 decided applications with an interview and 101 without.

ART UNIT 2127
31 APPS · 77% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

77% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 67%
DISPOSITION24 / 7 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION23.2 moart unit avg 28.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY34.5 moart unit avg 41.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility58% · art unit 51%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)97%
§103 — Obviousness97% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness35%

Based on 31 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

ART UNIT 2115
29 APPS · 76% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines control or regulating systems, and electric power networks.

76% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 81%
DISPOSITION22 / 7 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION21.4 moart unit avg 25.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY37.5 moart unit avg 36.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility23% · art unit 33%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)85%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness62%

Based on 29 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Vincent Wen-Liang Chang

  • What is Vincent Wen-Liang Chang's overall allowance rate?
    His allowance rate is 76% across 469 decided applications pooled from four art units in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Chang works across four art units: 2115, 2116, 2119, and 2127, all within Technology Center 2100.
  • What is the range of allowance rates across his art units?
    Allowance rates range from 60% to 83% across the art units in which Chang maintains a substantial record.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Vincent Wen-Liang Chang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 500 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP