Examiner Viresh R Patel

What the data says.

Examiner Viresh R Patel has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 27 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 2 and abandoned 25, yielding an allowance rate of 7%. This rate is calculated over the 27 decided applications and reflects the examiner's historical record in TC 2100. The allowance rate is a descriptive statistic of past dispositions and does not predict the outcome of any specific application.

How to read these numbers.

This profile presents a pooled record aggregating one art unit within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 7% describes historical dispositions across 27 decided cases and is not a prediction for any individual application. Pooled figures mask variation within art units and across different application types, claim sets, and prosecution histories. This data illustrates past outcomes only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Viresh R Patel

• 01What is Examiner Patel's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 7%, based on 27 disposed applications (2 allowed, 25 abandoned). This figure describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  The record covers one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
• 03What does the allowance rate mean?

  The allowance rate is the percentage of decided applications that were allowed. It reflects historical dispositions and does not predict outcomes for individual pending or future applications.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.