Examiner Vitali A Korobov has allowed 46 of 76 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Vitali A Korobov maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 76 disposed applications, the examiner issued 46 allowances and 30 abandonments, yielding an allowance rate of 61%. This figure reflects decided cases only and excludes any pending applications. The examiner's work spans a single art unit, pooled here as an overall record. The 61% rate describes historical outcomes on closed cases and is not predictive of any individual application.
This record aggregates all decisions within the examiner's assigned art unit(s) in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 61% summarizes past dispositions across all cases handled and is a historical aggregate, not a forecast for any specific application. Pooled figures mask variation within individual art units and do not account for differences in application complexity, claim scope, or prosecution history. Aggregate data describes what has occurred, not what will occur in any particular matter.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Vitali A Korobov has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 76 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP