LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/WALTER P HANCHAK
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Walter P Hanchak

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 167 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION AUG 2017
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Walter P Hanchak has allowed 113 of 167 decided applications (68%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

68% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Walter P Hanchak maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit. Across 167 disposed applications, 113 were allowed and 54 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 68%. This rate represents the percentage of applications that received a final decision (allowed or abandoned), excluding any pending matters. The record is a snapshot of outcomes on decided cases and does not forecast results on any particular application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all art units under the examiner's authority. The 68% allowance rate describes past dispositions across all assigned cases and is computed only from applications with final decisions—allowed or abandoned—excluding pending applications. Aggregate historical figures describe what has occurred, not what will occur on any specific application. Individual art-unit records may show different rates and are reported separately.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2122
167 APPS · 68% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

68% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION113 / 54 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION26.4 moart unit avg 27.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY45.3 moart unit avg 39.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility36% · art unit 55%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)61%
§103 — Obviousness97% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness16%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW90%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW59%+31 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 48 decided applications with an interview and 119 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Walter P Hanchak

  • What is Walter P Hanchak's overall allowance rate?
    His allowance rate is 68%, calculated from 113 allowed applications out of 167 total disposed applications in his pooled record.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    This pooled record covers one art unit (Art Unit 2122) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What do these figures represent?
    These figures describe the examiner's past record of decided applications. The allowance rate is a historical measure and is not a prediction of the outcome on any individual application.
  • How many applications have been abandoned?
    Fifty-four applications were abandoned out of the 167 total disposed applications in his pooled record.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Walter P Hanchak has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 167 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP