Examiner Wei Ma has allowed 92 of 124 decided applications (74%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Wei Ma maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, 124 applications have been disposed. Of those decided applications, 92 were allowed and 32 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 74%. The record spans 145 total filings. This pooled figure represents the examiner's historical performance across all assigned art units and does not constitute a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's performance across all art units under their assignment. The 74% allowance rate is calculated from 124 decided applications (allowed plus abandoned; pending applications are excluded). Aggregate historical figures describe past dispositions and are not predictions of any individual application's result. Different art units may exhibit different characteristics; this summary represents the combined performance across the entire portfolio.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 75 decided applications with an interview and 49 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Wei Ma has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 145 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP