Examiner Wei Yun Mui has allowed 80 of 123 decided applications (65%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Wei Yun Mui maintains a pooled allowance rate of 65% across 123 decided applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner's record spans two art units. Among these art units, allowance rates range from 59% to 81%, reflecting variation in outcomes across the different subject-matter areas within TC 2100. Of the 134 total applications in the examiner's record, 80 were allowed and 43 were abandoned. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's performance across both art units and represents the historical record only.
A pooled record aggregates an examiner's performance across multiple art units into a single allowance rate. This aggregate describes past outcomes, not any individual application's disposition. The range of allowance rates (59% to 81%) shows that outcomes vary by art unit; the pooled 65% is a weighted average. Pooled figures are historical data and are not predictions of any specific application's fate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 28 decided applications with an interview and 59 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Wei Yun Mui has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 134 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP