LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/WILLIAM S POWERS
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner William S Powers

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 55 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner William S Powers has allowed 32 of 55 decided applications (58%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

58% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

William S Powers maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 55 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 58%, with 32 applications allowed and 23 abandoned. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled record represents past decisions on applications that have been decided; it does not describe pending applications or predict outcomes on any particular case.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates decisions across the examiner's assigned art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 58% reflects the proportion of decided applications that were allowed, calculated from disposed applications only. Pooled figures describe the historical record and are not predictions for any specific application. Individual art-unit records may show different patterns and are maintained separately.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2134
55 APPS · 58% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines network security, and computer and data security.

58% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 67%
DISPOSITION32 / 23 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION40.2 moart unit avg 35.6 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY54.5 moart unit avg 50.7 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner William S Powers

  • What is William S Powers's overall allowance rate?
    58% of 55 disposed applications were allowed. This rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not include pending filings.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    The record spans 1 art unit in TC 2100. Pooled figures aggregate all decisions across the examiner's assigned units.
  • What does the allowance rate tell me?
    The allowance rate is a historical statistic: the percentage of decided applications that were allowed. It describes the past record and is not a prediction of the outcome of any particular application.
  • What is the technology center?
    Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). This designation defines the examiner's subject-matter jurisdiction.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner William S Powers has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 55 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP