Examiner Wilson Lee has allowed 669 of 772 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Wilson Lee maintains a public record across three art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 772 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 87%. This figure represents applications that were allowed or abandoned, pooled across all three art units. The allowance rate ranges from 81% to 91% across these art units, reflecting variation in the record by individual art-unit subject matter. The examiner's record encompasses 669 allowed applications and 103 abandoned applications across TC 2100.
This record is pooled across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 87% allowance rate aggregates decided applications from all three units and describes the historical record only—it is not a prediction of outcomes in any specific application. The range (81% to 91%) shows the spread of allowance rates among individual art units but does not identify which rate applies to which unit. Pooled figures are useful for understanding overall patterns but do not forecast results for any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 62 decided applications with an interview and 254 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 39 decided applications with an interview and 233 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 69 decided applications with an interview and 115 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Wilson Lee has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 772 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP