Examiner Wilson V Varga has allowed 71 of 116 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Wilson V Varga maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across the examiner's single art unit (2174), 116 applications have been disposed of, comprising 71 allowed and 45 abandoned. This yields an allowance rate of 61% over the decided applications. The allowance rate represents the proportion of disposed applications that were allowed, excluding pending matters from the calculation. This pooled record spans one art unit and covers all decided matters within that unit.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units in which an examiner works. The allowance rate and other figures describe the examiner's historical record and reflect patterns across multiple applications, not outcomes tied to any particular case. Aggregate statistics describe the past; they are correlational data and do not forecast results in any individual application. Each case presents distinct facts, claims, and arguments.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 57 decided applications with an interview and 59 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Wilson V Varga has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 116 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP