Examiner Wissam Rashid has allowed 675 of 759 decided applications (89%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Wissam Rashid maintains a public record across one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The pooled record spans 797 total applications, of which 759 have been disposed. Among the 759 decided applications, 675 were allowed and 84 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 89%. This allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed applications to all decided applications in the examiner's pooled history and does not represent a prediction for any individual case or filing.
This record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art units within TC 2100, pooling allowances and abandonments into a single historical figure. The 89% allowance rate describes past decisions on 759 disposed applications and is a correlation of the examiner's record. It is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome and does not indicate what any future examination will produce.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 265 decided applications with an interview and 494 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Wissam Rashid has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 797 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP