Examiner Woo H Choi has allowed 119 of 151 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Woo H Choi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 151 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 119 and abandoned 32, yielding an allowance rate of 79%. This rate reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The examiner's practice covers multiple art-unit areas within TC 2100, and the 79% figure represents the pooled outcome across all assignments in this technology center.
This record is a pooled aggregate across multiple art units within TC 2100. Pooled figures describe the examiner's past decisions across all assigned art units combined, not the outcome of any single application. An allowance rate is historical and reflects applications already decided; it is not a prediction about how any particular new case will be examined or disposed.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Woo H Choi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 151 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP