LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/XIOMARA L BAUTISTA
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Xiomara L Bautista

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 884 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2021
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Xiomara L Bautista has allowed 755 of 884 decided applications (85%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

85% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2171 · 90%AU 2179 · 78%AU 2173 · 71%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Xiomara L Bautista maintains a public record across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 884 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 85%. This rate reflects 755 allowed applications against 129 abandonments. The allowance rate ranges from 78% to 90% across the examiner's art units, indicating variation in outcomes by art unit. The pooled figure represents the aggregate record and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile pools data across multiple art units within TC 2100. An aggregate allowance rate describes historical outcomes across different subject matter areas and examiner assignments—not a forecast for any individual case. Rates vary by art unit, a detail reflected in the range shown. Pooled statistics describe the past record only and carry no predictive force for particular applications or prosecution paths.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2171
556 APPS · 90% ALLOWANCE
90% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 56%
DISPOSITION501 / 55 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.7 moart unit avg 22 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY31 moart unit avg 37.2 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility24% · art unit 38%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)56%
§103 — Obviousness61% · art unit 89%
§112 — Written description & definiteness16%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW94%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW88%+6 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 179 decided applications with an interview and 377 without.

ART UNIT 2179
321 APPS · 78% ALLOWANCE
78% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 53%
DISPOSITION249 / 72 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION30.8 moart unit avg 26.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY46.4 moart unit avg 43.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility64% · art unit 39%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)36%
§103 — Obviousness45% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness36%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW97%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW75%+22 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 32 decided applications with an interview and 289 without.

ART UNIT 2173
7 APPS · 71% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA
71% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 49%
DISPOSITION5 / 2 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION10.8 moart unit avg 25.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY25 moart unit avg 40.1 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Xiomara L Bautista

  • What is Xiomara L Bautista's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 85%, calculated over 884 disposed (decided) applications—755 allowed and 129 abandoned. This is a historical aggregate and not a prediction of any specific application outcome.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    The examiner's public record spans three art units (2171, 2173, 2179) within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary by art unit?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 78% to 90% across the examiner's art units. This pooled record aggregates those three units; individual art-unit rates are available in the separate art-unit section.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Xiomara L Bautista has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 884 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP