LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/XUAN MARIAN THAI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Xuan Marian Thai

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 49 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION AUG 2004
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Xuan Marian Thai has allowed 44 of 49 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

90% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2111 · 90%AU 2181 · 90%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Xuan Marian Thai maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units: 2111 and 2181. Over 49 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 44, for an overall allowance rate of 90%. Five applications were abandoned. This pooled figure reflects the examiner's aggregate record across both art units and represents decisions on applications that have reached final disposition. The record does not include pending applications.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 90% allowance rate describes past decisions on 49 closed applications and is a historical summary, not a prediction for any individual case. Pooled figures mask variation between art units; detailed per-unit data appears separately. Aggregate statistics describe what occurred, not what will occur on any specific application.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2111
29 APPS · 90% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA
90% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 80%
DISPOSITION26 / 3 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION27.4 moart unit avg 20.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY36.4 moart unit avg 31.7 mo
ART UNIT 2181
20 APPS · 90% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units, and program control and execution.

90% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 74%
DISPOSITION18 / 2 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION16.7 moart unit avg 18.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY22.7 moart unit avg 33.3 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Xuan Marian Thai

  • What is Examiner Thai's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 90%, based on 44 allowed applications and 5 abandoned applications among 49 total disposed applications in the public record.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    The pooled record spans 2 art units (2111 and 2181) within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate apply to my application?
    No. The 90% rate is a historical aggregate of past dispositions and is not a prediction of the outcome for any specific application. Individual cases depend on claim scope, prior art, and office action responses.
  • What does 'pooled' mean?
    Pooled means the figures combine data from both art units. The 90% rate reflects decisions across all 49 applications in both units together, not separately by unit.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Xuan Marian Thai has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 49 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP