Examiner Yair Leibovich has allowed 921 of 1,023 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Yair Leibovich maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 1,061 total applications, 921 have been allowed and 102 abandoned, yielding 1,023 disposed applications. The allowance rate stands at 90% of decided applications. This record spans a single art unit (2114) within TC 2100, aggregating prosecution outcomes over the examiner's tenure in that unit.
This pooled record aggregates all applications decided within the art unit(s) listed. The 90% allowance rate reflects the share of allowed applications among all disposed (decided) applications—pending applications are excluded from this calculation. Aggregate historical rates describe the past record and are not predictions about any specific application's outcome. Each case proceeds independently and may differ from the pooled average.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 314 decided applications with an interview and 709 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Yair Leibovich has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,061 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP