Examiner Yasin M Barqadle has allowed 61 of 106 decided applications (58%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Yasin M Barqadle has a public record spanning one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 106 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 61 and abandoned 45, for an overall allowance rate of 58%. This rate is based on decided applications only and does not include any pending cases. The record reflects outcomes in TC 2100 aggregated across the examiner's assigned art units.
This profile presents pooled data across all art units assigned to the examiner. The allowance rate is a historical aggregate—a summary of past dispositions—and does not forecast the outcome of any particular application. Pooled figures mask variation among individual art units; a separate section of this page provides per-art-unit detail. Aggregate statistics describe what occurred, not what will occur in your case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 37 decided applications with an interview and 69 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Yasin M Barqadle has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 106 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP