Examiner Yemane Mesfin has allowed 71 of 101 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Yemane Mesfin maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 101 applications. Of those decided applications, 71 were allowed and 30 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 70%. This figure represents the proportion of applications that received approval among all applications that reached a final disposition—either allowance or abandonment. The record reflects work across a single art unit within TC 2100.
This pooled record aggregates data across all art units in which the examiner works. The 70% allowance rate describes the historical proportion of allowed versus abandoned applications already decided. Pooled figures do not account for variation by art unit or application type and are not a prediction of the outcome of any specific pending or future application. Review of the examiner's per-art-unit breakdown, where available, may provide additional context.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 67 decided applications with an interview and 34 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Yemane Mesfin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 101 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP