Examiner Yi Hao

What the data says.

Examiner Yi Hao maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning one art unit. Across 20 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 5, for an allowance rate of 25%. The examiner's overall caseload includes 58 total applications filed, of which 15 were abandoned and 20 were decided (allowed or abandoned). This pooled record represents the examiner's aggregate history across all assigned art units and describes past outcomes only.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates outcomes across all of the examiner's art units. The allowance rate of 25% describes the examiner's historical record on decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application. Pooled figures mask variation across different art units and subject areas; they reflect overall patterns but do not indicate outcomes on individual cases or in particular technology areas.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).

Questions about Examiner Yi Hao

• 01What is Examiner Yi Hao's allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 25%, calculated over 20 disposed applications (allowed plus abandoned, pending excluded).
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  The examiner's public record spans one art unit in TC 2100.
• 03What does this pooled record represent?

  This pooled record aggregates the examiner's outcomes across all assigned art units. It describes past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 04Why is the total application count different from the disposed count?

  Total applications include pending cases not yet decided. The allowance rate uses only disposed (decided) applications—allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending cases.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.