Examiner Yin Chen Shaw has allowed 27 of 49 decided applications (55%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Yin Chen Shaw maintains a public record across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 49 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 27 and abandoned 22, yielding an allowance rate of 55%. This rate is based on applications that received a final disposition—allowed or abandoned—and does not include pending applications. The examiner's record spans art units 2135 and 2139 within TC 2100.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's activity across multiple art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 55% describes the examiner's historical disposal record and reflects the proportion of decided applications that were allowed. Aggregate figures do not predict outcomes in any individual application. Applicants seeking unit-specific data may review the separate per-art-unit section of this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Yin Chen Shaw has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 49 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP