Examiner Yohanes D Kelemework has allowed 41 of 61 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Yohanes D Kelemework maintains a public record of 61 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of these decided applications, 41 were allowed and 20 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 67%. This record spans a single art unit (2164). The allowance rate reflects the examiner's historical disposition of applications that have reached final decision; it is a description of past outcomes only and does not characterize any particular examination or predict outcomes in individual applications.
This profile presents pooled data aggregated across all art units in which the examiner maintains a record. The allowance rate of 67% describes the proportion of decided applications that resulted in allowance across the examiner's entire caseload. Aggregate statistics reflect the past record and are not predictive of the disposition of any specific application. Individual art units may have separate records; those figures, where available, are reported separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 29 decided applications with an interview and 32 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Yohanes D Kelemework has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 61 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP