Examiner Yolanda L Wilson has allowed 1,195 of 1,397 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Yolanda L Wilson maintains a public record across Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning 2 art units. Over 1,397 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 86%. The examiner allowed 1,195 applications and 202 were abandoned. This pooled figure reflects decisions across art units 2113 and 2184 and describes the historical record; it is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
This record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate represents past dispositions (allowed and abandoned applications) divided by total decided cases, excluding pending filings. Pooled figures describe the examiner's historical pattern across different subject areas and do not constitute predictions about individual applications or art units.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 67 decided applications with an interview and 1,318 without.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Yolanda L Wilson has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,450 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP