Examiner Yonas A Bayou has allowed 11 of 23 decided applications (48%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Yonas A Bayou maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 23 decided applications, the examiner has allowed 11 and abandoned 12, yielding an allowance rate of 48%. This record spans a single art unit (2134). The allowance rate of 48% reflects the ratio of allowed to all decided applications in the examiner's pooled history and does not predict outcomes in any specific case.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units where an examiner works and represents historical disposal patterns. The allowance rate (48% here) is computed from all decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending cases. This aggregate figure describes past outcomes and is not a prediction of any individual application's result. Art-unit-specific records appear separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines network security, and computer and data security.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Yonas A Bayou has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 23 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP