Examiner Yves Dalencourt has allowed 141 of 209 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Yves Dalencourt maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 209 disposed applications, 141 were allowed and 68 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 67% over the decided pool. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents the aggregate record across all assignments within that unit and is factual summary of past dispositions, not a prediction applicable to any individual application.
A pooled record aggregates all applications and dispositions across an examiner's assigned art units, smoothing variations that may exist within individual units. The allowance rate reflects the share of allowed applications among all decided cases (allowed plus abandoned), excluding any pending matters. Aggregate figures describe historical output and do not predict the outcome of any specific application or indicate how any particular case will be examined.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 112 decided applications with an interview and 97 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Yves Dalencourt has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 209 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP