Examiner Zachary A Davis has allowed 31 of 75 decided applications (41%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Zachary A Davis maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit and covers 75 disposed applications. Of those 75 decided applications, 31 were allowed and 44 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 41%. This rate reflects the proportion of allowed applications among all decided cases in his record. The data presents a historical aggregate across his art units and does not predict outcomes in any individual application.
This examiner's pooled record aggregates all decided applications across his assigned art units. The overall allowance rate of 41% is a historical average calculated from all disposed applications and reflects past outcomes across multiple art units combined. Aggregate figures describe what has occurred in the record and are not predictions about how any future or pending application will be examined or decided. Individual art-unit data may reveal different patterns.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 40 decided applications with an interview and 35 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Zachary A Davis has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 75 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP