Examiner Zaida Marrero has allowed 47 of 109 decided applications (43%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Zaida Marrero maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 109 disposed applications, 47 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 43%. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached a final decision—either allowed or abandoned. The 43% allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record and does not characterize any pending or future application.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units under their jurisdiction. The allowance rate and disposal counts reflect decided applications from the past and describe what has occurred, not what will occur in any individual case. Pooled figures combine different art units and represent overall historical outcomes. These statistics are correlational snapshots of past dispositions and are not predictions for specific applications currently pending or filed.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 26 decided applications with an interview and 83 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Zaida Marrero has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 109 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP