Examiner Zakaria Mohammed Belkhayat has allowed 23 of 25 decided applications (92%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Zakaria Mohammed Belkhayat holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning a single art unit. Across 58 total applications, 23 have been allowed and 2 abandoned, resulting in 25 disposed applications. The allowance rate over those 25 decided applications is 92%. This pooled figure represents the historical record of applications that reached a final decision in TC 2100 and is a snapshot of past outcomes only, not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
This record pools all art units under the examiner's assignment. When multiple art units are present, the allowance rate aggregates different subject areas and examining approaches into a single figure. The 92% rate reflects applications already decided and describes the historical record only. Pooled figures do not account for variations across individual art units and are not predictions about any pending or future application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Zakaria Mohammed Belkhayat has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 58 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP