Examiner Zarni Maung

What the data says.

Examiner Zarni Maung maintains a public record spanning 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 117 disposed applications, 102 were allowed and 15 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 87%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided applications that issued, excluding any pending matters. The record aggregates activity across both art units and represents historical disposition data without indication of outcomes on specific future applications.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record combines statistics from multiple art units into a single aggregate figure. The allowance rate shown here—87% over 117 decided applications—describes past dispositions across both units together and does not separate performance by individual art unit. Aggregate historical rates describe what occurred in closed applications; they are not predictions of any specific application's outcome. Individual art-unit records are published separately.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Zarni Maung

• 01What is Examiner Zarni Maung's overall allowance rate?

  87% across 117 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100. This rate reflects the share of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) that were allowed, and does not account for pending matters.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  Two art units: 2151 and 2154. The figures shown here are pooled across both units and do not break performance down by individual unit.
• 03What do these statistics tell me about my application?

  Historical allowance rates describe past dispositions and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome. Each application is examined on its own merits according to statutory requirements.
• 04What is the technology center descriptor?

  Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). This examiner's record spans TC 2100 only.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.