Examiner Zujia Xu has allowed 124 of 179 decided applications (69%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Zujia Xu maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering a single art unit. Across 217 total applications, 179 have been disposed of (decided). Of those 179 disposed applications, 124 were allowed and 55 were abandoned, yielding an overall allowance rate of 69%. This rate is computed from decided applications only and does not reflect pending cases. The record represents aggregate examination activity across the examiner's assigned art unit.
This pooled record aggregates examination data across a single art unit. The 69% allowance rate describes the examiner's past decisions on closed applications and is not a prediction of any specific case outcome. Aggregate statistics reflect historical patterns but vary by application complexity, claim scope, prior art, and individual prosecution history. Any single application's disposition depends on its particular facts and evidence.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 143 decided applications with an interview and 36 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Zujia Xu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 217 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP