LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2400/NAOD W BELAI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER, ART UNIT, OR APPLICATION #
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Naod W Belai

TECH CENTER 2400 · 1 ART UNIT · 333 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION NOV 2024
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT
74%vs 66% art-unit average+8 pts
higher than about 58% of the 24 examiners with published rates in art unit 2481
AU avg 66%
0%
100%
Each short mark is one of the 24 examiners with published rates in art unit 2481; the dot is this examiner. The tick is the art-unit average.

Examiner Naod W Belai has allowed 248 of 333 decided applications.

248 allowed
85 abandoned
No applications pending.
DATA UPDATED JULY 22, 2026

What the data says.reading this examiner

Naod W Belai maintains a public record in Technology Center 2400 spanning one art unit. Across hundreds of decided applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 74%. This figure represents the share of applications that were allowed among all decided applications (allowed and abandoned combined), excluding pending matters. The allowance rate reflects the examiner's historical record and is calculated only from applications with final dispositions.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across all art units in which an examiner has decided applications. The allowance rate and other figures describe the examiner's past record and reflect correlations, not causation. These statistics are a historical summary and are not predictions about the outcome of any specific application. Individual art-unit records may differ from pooled figures.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.1 art unit

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2481
333 APPS · 74% ALLOWANCE

Allowance ratewhere this examiner sits among peers

74%
higher than about 58% of the 24 examiners with published rates in art unit 2481
AU avg 66%
0%
100%
Each short mark is one of the 24 examiners with published rates in art unit 2481; the dot is this examiner. The tick is the art-unit average.

Disposition333 decided applications

248 allowed
85 abandoned
No applications pending.

Pendencymonths from filing

filed
first action 22.4mo
disposed 36.9mo
0
48mo
Art-unit average: first action 24.5 mo, disposed 40.2 mo.

Rejection groundsexaminer ● vs art-unit average ○

REJECTION RATE = SHARE OF THIS EXAMINER'S APPLICATIONS THAT DREW ≥1 OFFICE-ACTION REJECTION IN WHICH THE GROUND APPEARS

Grounds can co-occur, so the four don't sum to 100%. The art-unit figure is the unweighted mean across examiners in the art unit; §102 and §112 carry no art-unit benchmark.

§101 — Subject-matter eligibility
AU 24
25%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)
no AU benchmark
58%
§103 — Obviousness
AU 84
90%
§112 — Written description & definiteness
no AU benchmark
52%

Interview benefit

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

without
83%
14 pts
with
69%

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 197 decided applications with an interview and 136 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Naod W Belai

  • What is Naod W Belai's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 74% across hundreds of decided applications pooled across all art units. This is the percentage of allowed applications among all decided matters (allowed and abandoned).
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Naod W Belai's public record spans one art unit in Technology Center 2400.
  • What does the allowance rate mean?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of decided applications (those with final allow or abandon dispositions) that were allowed. It excludes pending applications and is a historical measure, not a prediction for any individual case.
  • Does this pooled record apply to my application?
    No. The pooled figures describe the examiner's past record. They are not predictions about any specific application and do not account for the particular facts, claims, or art relevant to any individual matter.
◈ HOW LYNCH LLP CAN HELP

Where to go next.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. These are general resources about the firm's services — not advice about this examiner or any specific application.

Lynch LLP's patent practiceApplication drafting, office-action responses, and prosecution strategy before the USPTO.Work before the Patent Trial and Appeal BoardAppeals, inter partes review, and patent-owner defense before the PTAB.Planning a patent portfolio over timeHow a patent portfolio is sequenced and built over a multi-year horizon.The firm's consultation optionsFree and paid consultation options across the firm's attorneys.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Naod W Belai has a public record within Technology Center 2400. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated July 22, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 333 applications.

Rejection rates. Each §-rate is the share of this examiner's applications that drew at least one office-action rejection in which that statutory ground appears; applications with no rejection on record are excluded, and because grounds can co-occur the four do not sum to 100%. The art-unit figure beside each is the unweighted mean of the per-examiner rates across the art unit, published for §101 and §103 only. Beside the overall allowance rate we show a benchmark: for a single-art-unit examiner it is exactly that art unit's average, labeled “art-unit average”; for an examiner spanning several art units it is the “weighted peer average” — the per-art-unit averages, weighted by this examiner's application count in each — labeled distinctly because it is a blended figure, not any single art unit's average. Both are built from the same per-art-unit averages the panels show.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP