LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2400/SUNGHYOUN PARK
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER, ART UNIT, OR APPLICATION #
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Sunghyoun Park

TECH CENTER 2400 · 1 ART UNIT · 726 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUL 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT
78%vs 72% art-unit average+6 pts
higher than 10 of the 16 examiners with published rates in art unit 2484
AU avg 72%
0%
100%
Each short mark is one of the 16 examiners with published rates in art unit 2484; the dot is this examiner. The tick is the art-unit average.

Examiner Sunghyoun Park has allowed 565 of 726 decided applications.

565 allowed
161 abandoned
Plus 59 applications still pending — not yet decided, so excluded from the rate.
DATA UPDATED JULY 22, 2026

What the data says.reading this examiner

Sunghyoun Park holds a public record in Technology Center 2400 across one art unit. The examiner's pooled allowance rate stands at 78% across hundreds of decided applications. This rate represents the share of applications in the examiner's record that resulted in allowance rather than abandonment. The pooled figure aggregates all decided applications across the examiner's assigned art unit(s) and reflects outcomes in the technology center over the period covered by the public record.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates an examiner's outcomes across all assigned art units into a single overall allowance rate. This aggregate figure describes the examiner's historical record—what occurred in past applications—and does not constitute a prediction for any specific pending application. Individual art units may have different allowance rates; the pooled rate masks this variation and is most useful as general context about the examiner's overall decided-application history.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.1 art unit

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2484
785 APPS · 78% ALLOWANCE

Allowance ratewhere this examiner sits among peers

78%
higher than 10 of the 16 examiners with published rates in art unit 2484
AU avg 72%
0%
100%
Each short mark is one of the 16 examiners with published rates in art unit 2484; the dot is this examiner. The tick is the art-unit average.

Disposition726 decided applications

565 allowed
161 abandoned
Plus 59 applications still pending — not yet decided, so excluded from the rate.

Pendencymonths from filing

filed
first action 18.9mo
disposed 32.6mo
0
36mo
Art-unit average: first action 20.4 mo, disposed 34.5 mo.

Rejection groundsexaminer ● vs art-unit average ○

REJECTION RATE = SHARE OF THIS EXAMINER'S APPLICATIONS THAT DREW ≥1 OFFICE-ACTION REJECTION IN WHICH THE GROUND APPEARS

Grounds can co-occur, so the four don't sum to 100%. The art-unit figure is the unweighted mean across examiners in the art unit; §102 and §112 carry no art-unit benchmark.

§101 — Subject-matter eligibility
AU 24
24%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)
no AU benchmark
77%
§103 — Obviousness
AU 77
79%
§112 — Written description & definiteness
no AU benchmark
35%

Interview benefit

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

without
76%
+7 pts
with
83%

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 167 decided applications with an interview and 559 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Sunghyoun Park

  • What is Sunghyoun Park's allowance rate?
    The examiner's pooled allowance rate is 78%, calculated from hundreds of decided applications across all art units. This reflects the share of applications in the examiner's record that were allowed rather than abandoned.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Sunghyoun Park's public record spans one art unit. The pooled record shown here aggregates all outcomes in that art unit.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate predict about my application?
    The pooled rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of outcome for any specific application. It describes past outcomes only and does not account for individual application facts, claim scope, or prosecution strategy.
◈ HOW LYNCH LLP CAN HELP

Where to go next.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. These are general resources about the firm's services — not advice about this examiner or any specific application.

How the firm prosecutes patentsApplication drafting, office-action responses, and prosecution strategy before the USPTO.Appeals and PTAB practiceAppeals, inter partes review, and patent-owner defense before the PTAB.IP portfolio strategyHow a patent portfolio is sequenced and built over a multi-year horizon.Scheduling time with an attorneyFree and paid consultation options across the firm's attorneys.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Sunghyoun Park has a public record within Technology Center 2400. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated July 22, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 785 applications.

Rejection rates. Each §-rate is the share of this examiner's applications that drew at least one office-action rejection in which that statutory ground appears; applications with no rejection on record are excluded, and because grounds can co-occur the four do not sum to 100%. The art-unit figure beside each is the unweighted mean of the per-examiner rates across the art unit, published for §101 and §103 only. Beside the overall allowance rate we show a benchmark: for a single-art-unit examiner it is exactly that art unit's average, labeled “art-unit average”; for an examiner spanning several art units it is the “weighted peer average” — the per-art-unit averages, weighted by this examiner's application count in each — labeled distinctly because it is a blended figure, not any single art unit's average. Both are built from the same per-art-unit averages the panels show.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP